History of Sexuality

Home Page Recent Changes Log In


Revision 6 . . (edit) October 22, 2004 8:10 pm by Echo
Revision 5 . . (edit) October 21, 2004 8:24 pm by Grace
Revision 3 . . October 21, 2004 6:47 pm by Trilogee
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 18c18,25
There is more debate on what a "fetish" is than "sexuality" or "gender".
There is more debate on what a "fetish" is than "sexuality" or "gender".

Where



Warpian standards on proper times and circumstances are a striking standard that can even influence people not affliated to that Warp while within it. Top apparently flavors private sexualities but public power displays, whereas Up functions solely on a basis of avoiding public disturbances. Down is interesting, it's noticable that while there aren't any strict rules against public exhibitionism, people tend to take their sex to more intimate surrounding, though privacy varies (from popular if intimate drug dens, to private hideaways). Charm appears to view sex as just another acceptable public play, while for Bottom it's a way of life, a culture. And Strange has no real rules whatever.

I'm going on about notions of acceptable circumstances for sex because it really does seem to impact peoples sexualities noticably. And Down's a case that interests me, because as anarchic as it is, I've noticed they seem to tend toward somewhat more privacy or at least smaller public surroundings than Bottom or Charm. I wonder what factors induce this?

:I'm going to suggest that maybe it's because grimy streets aren't commonly accepted as being comfortable places to make out. Though there are people who prefer them, we haven't seen many. - Echo

Home Page Recent Changes Log In
Search: